Skip navigation links
Home
Using This Resource
Introduction
Key Topics
Additional Resources
Feedback
Skip navigation links
How systematic should you be?
The stages of a systematic review
1. Produce a review protocol / plan
2. Assemble a review group / advisory group
3. Formulate review question(s)
4. Conduct a thorough search
5. Select relevant studies
6. Appraise the quality of studies
7. Extract information from individual studies
8. Synthesise studies
9. Report what is known and not known
10. Inform research, policy and practice
Snowballing 


The snowballing technique involves two approaches. First, you scour the references section of articles that you have already included in the review. Second, you can use certain citation tracking databases to identify articles that have subsequently cited papers that you have included in the review. The first approach works back in time from the article, whilst the second approach works forward in time from that same article.  Some databases allow you to undertake this process electronically.

You should perform both reference tracking and citation tracking for every article that you deem relevant for the review.  Make a list of the articles that you find by snowballing and include this table in your protocol/plan.

List of articles Number of papers
Located through reference tracking:

1.

2.

n.

Located through citation tracking:

1.

2.

n.

 Total number of articles located through snowballing

 To download and use this document - click on the word document here

The text on this page was created by Professor David Denyer, Professor of Organizational Change, Cranfield School of Management.